People Say No to More Taxes
Jan 29 2022
The Sch
Board's Excess Levy Election was held on Saturday, Jan 29th.
The Levy failed 278 to 348 votes against. Every precinct but
two voted against continuing the outlandish tax grab while the
Pentagon sets on millions and million of COVID dollars. The
Levy would have pulled in $2.25 million additional dollars.
Election nights normally fill the Courthouse as
Clayonians stop by and watch the counting and rub bellies with
politicians.
With polling places closing at 7:30, all votes were
tallied and read out loud by 9:20pm
We noticed.. the election organization at the
Courthouse went smooth. Every seal was in place and the public
could watch every step of the process
Poor ole Sch Bd Chair Dave Mullins sat over in
the corner and never moved, never smiled. He was a chewing gun
chomping bump on a pickle as soon as the first precinct
results were read. Superintendent Paxton came a bit late and
once he looked at the results, he too never moved from his
perch and never smiled. There was no joy in Mudville.
Before the last precinct was in, talk was already
in progress on when they could try the Levy again. Some
thought they had to wait 90 days before floating it again. One
guy spoke, let's try it in the Fall.
One lady said why not try during the Primary Election
in May. Big frowny lines could be seen, The greedy ones sure
didn't want to try again when a larger electorate would be at
the polls.
There's another problem with waiting to retry the
effort. Three Boardsters, Dave Mullins, Morgy Triplett, and
Cheryl White are up for re-election May 4th. If voters turn
them out to pasture, the next leaders may poo poo the whole
EXCESS Levy election.
Before another election is held, the Sch Bd has to vote
in public to do so. Our guess, any of the three that votes to
retry the Excess Levy, those folks will fail May 4th. Just a
guess of course but seems to make sense. For instance, it has
happened in the past, the Pentagon lost two sitting Boardsters
with another (JD Morris off their group as he moved to the
State Sch Bd) after voting to retry an Excess Levy .

Courthouse workers handling the School EXCESS Levy Election on
Saturday Jan 29th

After many successful election cycles, what happened this time
around? Some thoughts...
It's tough to beg for more $$$
from the poorest people in the state and all while the
Superintendent tools around town in a shiny black Mercedes
Benz. There's a certain amount of resentment among the natives
here.
To get an extra dig at your pocketbook to be
successful, election day must be on a snowy, cold, sleety day.
This Jan 29th, they got all they wanted weather wise. Total
voters amounted to just 626. School leaders feel, if they get
just their employees and family members, to vote, they will be
successful. Didn't work this time around. The 348 no
votes is nearly the number of employees in the system when you
consider wives, husbands etc.
In nearly every precinct , the majority said no
to continuing the extra drag. That means it wasn't just a
pocket of resistance like up at Ivydale where Pentagon closed
the community grade school there. It was like that years ago
when leadership closed Brown Grade School. In that voting
precinct even today, those folks are still peed.
Just before election day, word spread that 3600
landowners in the county have just received property tax
increases of OVER 10%. 10%! Even if that equates to just
a few more $$$ taken, that makes taxpayers mader.
Just five days before the election, Board Chair
Dave Mullins managed to show his arss while putting his size
10 in his mouth. During the Jan 24th Board meeting , one guy
asked how many kids were actually participating in the non
traditional, virtual class work. Instead of saying I don't
know, Mullins said the public could ask questions all they
want but they (administration) would NEVER provide an answer
to parents, sponsors, supporters, contributors or even the
media.
Between the new assessment on property taxes, and
Mullins showing his true colors, we think the public put their
feets down and said Nope, not with our tax money.
But wait there's more! When's a good time to
retry the Levy?
IF they try cramming the thang down our throats before
the May 4th Primary election, those three incumbent
Boardsters, they are toast. IF they try another attempt
before the next regular election May 4th, that means they have
peed away thousands upon thousands of school dollars putting
on the second attempt election. But,... without snow and ice
to slow voters down, that may be doomed for the
Pentagon.
IF they wait until after the May 4th
primary election, that's dangerous too. If any new School
Boardsters come on board on May 4th, the vote to hold another
Excess Levy Election, that's not a sure thing, it could be in
jeopardy.
So. What else could they do to get their unneeded
$2.25million?
They could talk up closing H E White Elem and or
Lizemore Elem. Remember, according to the Call for the Levy,
if either of those schools vote down the Levy, they can be
closed. Here comes the Hmmmmmmmm... H E White voters approved
the Excess in their precinct, see below. Lizemores did
not. They shot it down 2 to 1.
The Pentagon has already closed down H E White in the
past. While being taken to Court, the Pentagon went ahead and
pulled out the schools' wiring, DSL cables, and furniture
Jusge Charles King ordered the school reopened post haste.
The reckless Pentagon could attempt it again even
if they support the Levy.
Dirty tricks happen all the time readers.

Comin' up just a wittle short. The big "L" goes on those
foreheads
Superintendent Joe Paxton (L), Sch Boardster Dave Mullins
(R)
Note: In 2017 , when the last School
Levy Election was held, the count was 476 for taxation
and 329 against it. Total 805 ballots. This time around,
read below.
Here's the numbers
Precinct
1a Harrison
18 for, 19 against
Precinct 15-a Valley Fork / Hively 49 for, 46
against
Precinct 24a Nebo
12 for, 21 against
Precinct 25a Ivydale
12 for, 56 against
Precinct 4b Widen/Dille
3
for, 1 against
Precinct 12b Clay
14 for, 16
against
Precinct 17b Dundon/ 2Run
47 for,
57 against
Precinct 33b Hartland, Bickmore
28 for, 38 against
Precinct 29c Lizemore
24 for, 55 against
Precinct 36c Bomont
54 for, 24 against
Precinct 37c Dulls Creek
17 for, 15 against
Total For: 278; Against: 348
Total 626 ballots cast
AW